New York lawmakers are moving closer to approving a statewide moratorium on new large-scale data centers. Supporters of the proposal say that the move is necessary to protect the state’s electric grid and prevent rising utility costs. Opponents have jumped on the legislation, warning that it will undermine economic development and technological investment.
If approved by the Legislature and signed by Governor Kathy Hochul – who is expected to do so – the measure would make New York the first state in the nation to enact a statewide pause on new large-scale data center development.
The legislation, sponsored by State Senator Kristen Gonzalez and Assemblymember Didi Barrett, was introduced Monday and is expected to be voted on before lawmakers leave Albany for the year.
The proposal comes amid concern by democrats over the rapid expansion of data centers nationwide as demand for artificial intelligence, cloud computing and digital infrastructure continues to surge.
Supporters argue that New York needs additional time to study the impact these facilities could have on electricity demand, utility rates and the environment before allowing major new projects to move forward.
“The one year moratorium gives us the time and space to properly promulgate rules and plan for what our energy future can look like, where we are not only protecting our energy grid, but we’re protecting our utility rates,” said Gonzalez.
The legislation originally began as a proposal for a three-year moratorium before lawmakers reduced the timeframe to one year.
Under the revised bill, the state would temporarily halt Department of Environmental Conservation permits for new data centers requiring more than 20 megawatts of electricity.
The measure is intended to give state regulators additional time to develop oversight requirements and determine how future projects should be integrated into New York’s power grid.
The debate comes as data center proposals continue emerging across the state.
While New York has not yet experienced the same level of development seen in states such as Virginia, Texas and Ohio, lawmakers and environmental advocates say a growing number of projects are seeking access to the electrical grid, raising questions about long-term reliability and costs.
The issue has become part of a broader national debate outside of New York.
Communities across the country have begun adopting local moratoriums and restrictions on large-scale data centers as concerns grow about electricity consumption, water usage, environmental impacts and potential strain on infrastructure.
Republican and Democratic officials in multiple states have proposed measures aimed at slowing development until additional safeguards can be implemented.
In New York, state regulators have already begun examining how data centers should be handled.
The Public Service Commission launched a review process after Hochul called for developers to provide their own energy resources and pay the full costs associated with connecting projects to the grid rather than shifting those expenses onto utility customers.
The latest version of the legislation contains several provisions beyond the temporary permitting pause.
Among them are proposals to establish a new electric rate structure specifically for large data centers, impose energy-efficiency standards and require compliance with renewable energy goals and labor requirements.
Supporters say those protections are needed to ensure residential customers do not bear the financial burden of rapidly growing electricity demand.
Democratic Assemblymember Anna Kelles, who previously sponsored the three-year moratorium proposal, said lawmakers cannot afford to delay action.
“We need to do something,” she said.
The legislation would also require the Department of Environmental Conservation to complete a comprehensive environmental impact study within 18 months.
Kelles said lawmakers need more information about the effects these facilities could have on communities and natural resources.
“We need to know what the full impact is of these large data centers on air, water, soil and noise pollution, the impact on farmland, and the magnitude of electronic waste,” said Kelles. “We know the impact is significant but we can’t minimize it if we don’t know the full magnitude.”
Not everyone agrees.
Business groups and technology industry representatives have strongly opposed the proposal, arguing that a blanket statewide moratorium could discourage investment and place New York at a competitive disadvantage.
The Long Island Association, one of the state’s largest business organizations, warned that the legislation will prevent worthwhile projects from moving forward.
“We think it would overall be damaging to the state’s economy because having a blanket moratorium instead of looking at it at a case by case basis would not allow the state to move forward on a data center project that would actually be helpful to our economy,” said Stacey Sikes, acting president and CEO of the Long Island Association.
The Digital Power Network, which represents cryptocurrency mining companies and other digital infrastructure interests, also voiced opposition.
In a memo opposing the legislation, the group argued that the proposal will create uncertainty for companies considering investment in New York.
“These provisions would destabilize the regulatory environment for advanced computing infrastructure at the very moment such infrastructure is a strategic national priority,” the group’s memo states.
The debate carries particular significance for communities throughout New York that are actively pursuing data center development projects.
Supporters often point to the industry’s potential to generate construction jobs, private investment and new tax revenue. Critics counter that many projects require enormous amounts of electricity while creating relatively few permanent jobs compared to other forms of development.
Lawmakers are scheduled to conclude their legislative session after June 4th, meaning we will know in the next 48 hours whether something gets passed or not.
Whether the proposal ultimately becomes law may depend on Hochul, but sources indicate that given her willingness this year to move left on certain issues she is likely to sign such a bill. A three year bill, however, would have bene out of the question.
Maine Governor Janet Mills, a fellow Democrat, vetoed a similar proposal earlier this year.
For now, Hochul’s administration is not taking a public position on the legislation.
“The Governor will review the bill,” said Hochul spokesperson Kristin Devoe.
If approved, the measure would temporarily halt some of New York’s largest proposed data center developments while regulators and lawmakers determine how the state should manage an industry expected to play a major role in the future of artificial intelligence and digital technology.