top of page

The Pros and Cons of Removing Rocks Beneath the American Falls

For decades, the majestic spectacle of the Niagara Falls has captivated millions of visitors worldwide. Among the cascading torrents of this natural wonder, the American Falls in particular stand as a dominant sight. The American Falls have a unique character that sets them apart from the rest of Niagara - the enormous boulders piled up at the base. The sight of water rushing over and around these rocks offers a unique aesthetic beauty, but recently the debate around whether to remove these rocks has surged again, bringing an array of opinions and arguments from various sides. Here are the pros and cons of removing rocks beneath the American Falls.

Niagara Falls American Falls New York USA

On one side of the argument are those who champion for the rocks' removal. They argue that removing the rocks could possibly restore the falls to their pristine and uninterrupted beauty. Some cite safety concerns as reasons, asserting that the rocks might pose potential threats for adventurous tourists who venture close. There are also geological concerns. Some geologists believe the boulders could potentially expedite erosion or shift, affecting the stability of the Falls and consequently their overall appearance.


However, there is a strong case for the opposite side of the argument as well. There are those who staunchly argue against removing the rocks, and their reasons are just as valid.


To begin with, the boulders at the base of the American Falls offer a visual contrast that contributes greatly to the site's aesthetic appeal. The rocks help to give the waterfall a unique character, adding texture and a raw, rugged feel that might otherwise be lost. Removing the boulders could also dramatically change the nature and flow of the falls, and many visitors appreciate the diversity that the different types of falls present.


Moreover, some conservationists argue that these rocks provide important habitats for several species, from plants growing in the moisture of the water's spray, to birds and mammals using the rocks for resting, nesting or feeding. Interfering with these habitats could disturb the local ecosystem and affect the biodiversity in the area.


Another consideration is the massive cost and logistics of such an operation. To remove tons of rock from the base of a major waterfall would be a hugely expensive task requiring sophisticated technology and a lot of time. The noise and disruption of the process could also impact the experience of tourists visiting during that time.


It's crucial to mention the historical aspect as well. The rocks are remnants of a 1954 landslide and stand as witnesses to the falls' dynamic and changing nature over the years. Some believe removing them could equate to erasing a significant part of the site's geological history.


Lastly, there is an argument that the boulders have the opposite effect on erosion and that instead of potentially facilitating it, that it works to slow it down. This was mentioned in the 1974 report that came out after the American and Bridal Veil Falls were dammed in 1969.


In conclusion, whether to remove or retain the rocks under the American Falls is not an easy decision and has sparked varied viewpoints. While each argument carries its own merit, any future action should ideally consider both the preservation of the falls' unique appeal and its ecological impact. It's not just about aesthetics or safety, but also about respecting the essence of nature and the geological history of one of the world's most iconic waterfalls. Ultimately, the Niagara Falls belongs to everyone, and so the decision about its future should consider everyone's opinions.

bottom of page